I obviously don't agree with some of Mr. Conacher's comments. I found a number of people to have contravened the act. I do believe in applying the law as it's written and not making up aspects of the law. I can point out that, on a number of occasions, Mr. Conacher took me to the courts on a judicial review and was never successful. It was just a whole series of judicial reviews.
Different people approach legislation in different ways. Some people go beyond the mandate. I try to read the law as it reads. But you know what? By the same token, I've seen Mr. Conacher make sensible suggestions on a number of occasions and actually say some sensible things. I don't agree with everything he says, but he's not an idiot.