As I always say, the camel was the racehorse that was designed by the committee. I don't mind if we have one or two humps on this camel.
In thinking about an amendment, I would suggest “children, seniors, vulnerable populations”. I think it's important that we're not just saying that racialized communities are part of seniors and children; they're separate. They're a separate issue.
I would say “children, seniors, vulnerable populations; and that the committee examine the potential impacts of AI and facial recognition technology on racialized communities.” It's a stand-alone thing, because it's a different factor from what's happening with seniors and children. Rather than lumping them all together, I think we have to....
I appreciate your thinking on it. Would that be clear enough?
There are other things that are going to come out in the study. This gives us an overall framework. We can find other things. We can add other things. However, I think what you've added puts us in a very clear mode.
Was the language clear?