Thank you.
For the purpose of clarity, I'm going to be very clear: What I need to hear from the members opposite is that they believe the Prime Minister should testify in front of this committee, not that they support the motion. I've been around doing this long enough. You know, if you make it in Hamilton, you can make it anywhere.
What I want to hear is that they believe it's the mandate of this committee to have the Prime Minister testify before us, not just invite him. I'm not interested in invitations. I can invite the man to my wedding; it doesn't mean he's going to show up. I want him here.
Unless I hear from the members opposite—members, plural—that they believe the Prime Minister should be here to testify under the mandate of this committee, I'll be supporting the subamendment. That won't get any clearer.
It doesn't mean you support the motion. That's not enough. I want to hear you say that you believe the Prime Minister should be sitting in that chair, being held accountable by this committee.