That's not what the motion's about. This is an interesting turn of events, with all due respect, Mr. Kurek.
The NDP introduced a motion that was specifically about doing a study. Mr. Barrett attempted to broaden the scope of it by including more witnesses. We have put forward a subamendment that would increase that even more, and you've completely reverted back to talking about a current scandal that's going on.
That actually supports what I previously said, that it appears as though this is more politically motivated than a genuine study of this report.
This is extremely troubling. Please correct me, if I'm wrong on this.