I totally understand. It is just that whether or not that due diligence was done is very germane to the parliamentary investigation. We will continue to look.
What's been very complex for parliamentarians in dealing with the WE issue is that we are dealing with a group that is very complex in its corporate structure. There are multiple companies, and we are trying to get a clear sense out of something that's difficult.
When we were first told about the role of Margaret Trudeau and Sacha Trudeau, we were told they weren't paid. The board of directors was told they weren't getting paid. That was false. The committee testimony found out that upwards of $350,000 was being paid, but the Kielburgers said that they weren't paid to do public speaking; they were paid to do ancillary corporate events. That's the big work afterwards in terms of the corporate sponsorships, which would be very lucrative to their organization.
I know you can't reveal much, but would the issue of the ancillary events and being paid to work corporate events for an organization be something you would consider part of your investigation?