Thank you.
My next question is about the criteria that define reasonable knowledge. It is set out in subsection 6(1) of the act. The subsection states that a public office holder reasonably should know that, in the making of the decision, he or she would be in a conflict of interest.
For example, if an elected public office holder decides to award a contract to an organization and may be in a conflict of interest situation, do you think that is reasonable knowledge? Under those circumstances, should he or she avoid awarding the contract?