Again, I can't comment specifically on that case.
What I am willing to say, however, is that there seems to be some misunderstanding of the obligations in the Lobbying Act. A few times, I did hear the WE Charity representatives say that the government had contacted them, not the other way around.
Who contacts who isn't really germane to whether any lobbying took place. Generally, I would say there may be a lack of understanding of the act.
I also saw news stories claiming that the organization might be cleared of any wrongdoing because it had registered. Someone who decides to register has to be transparent, which is what I encourage. We were able to see what the communications were, but that does not mean that any review I might be conducting stops because the individual has registered.