Well, I think so. One would assume that these questions would be asked, but in the 5,000 pages of documents, those questions don't seem to have been asked.
For example, our committee found out that the board of directors was fired in the middle of the pandemic for asking for financial statements as the Kielburgers were firing hundreds of staff. My understanding of a charity is that the charity board is there to oversee financial propriety. However, Michelle Douglas told us that she had been fired, was told to go. The other board was removed. None of the questions about financial capacity was asked in any of the documents the government looked at. It just assumed that the WE group, under the Kielburgers, delivered.
Do you think that would be problematic?