Just to follow on that, I'm reasonably comfortable with the idea that if Spencer Elms comes, which was in the purview of the original understanding of the study, we can say that the new witness would go alongside Spencer Elms.
I would say, though, that if Spencer Elms has refused in some way and hasn't gotten back to us—and I don't know what the status of all of that is—I personally have no issue with this witness providing a statement in advance, not taking any time at committee and being alongside the Kielburgers for our committee, so long as there's an understanding that she or whoever it is does not answer unless called upon by one of us specifically to answer one of our questions.
I take no personal issue with that. As long as everyone is on the same page here, we're not spending any time that would otherwise be spent by a member wanting to ask questions of the Kielburgers.