Thank you, Chair.
I'm speaking to the subamendment. I really do appreciate the effort by Mr. Angus to help this committee complete this work, so that we can get to other work.
In the same way that Mr. Fergus said that the only mention of Mr. Chin was by Mr. Kielburger referring to a LinkedIn message, I think that by the nature of that involvement—especially after seven months and all of us going through reams of documents with a fine-tooth comb on this issue—if there is an outstanding question, it can be dispensed with very quickly with a letter of request from yourself. That's just as we ask witnesses to do all the time—to provide us with written documentation.
I do agree with Mr. Angus that we can then move on to the material that we have received just recently with regard to MindGeek. It is very disturbing and I think that we owe it to Canadians to get back to that work.
On this issue of the WE study, we can dispense with it very quickly. That was the effort we made in the subamendment we had earlier, which was to request the answer to the committee's questions and move on.
Thank you.