I think what we're seeing here is childish behaviour, because we have serious issues to deal with. A colleague has been asked to withdraw his remark and he's withdrawn it. We've been asking Mr. Fergus to come up with the language of the subamendment. He either has it or he doesn't. To continue to try to pick a fight with Mr. Fortin is to me not credible. We have wasted a lot of time here. We've been told time and time again by the Liberals that they want to get down to work, so let's get down to work.
Does he have wording of a motion that actually may be in order? It may not be in order, and that's what I want to know. Does he actually have language for the motion? Can he get to that, please?