I raised my hand to speak about the previous motion. Time is flying.
With regard to the amendment, I understand our colleague's suggestion. However, his proposal significantly alters the text of the main motion. This isn't just a matter of obtaining the document or asking the witness to provide it. The proposal is to select only one of the three names put forward. He is also being asked to confirm that he hasn't had any discussions other than this one. That's a leading question.
This seems a little too simplistic to achieve the objective of the main motion. I would find it difficult to agree with this proposal regarding the subamendment.