Yes. I think it's very important, because Mr. Poilievre has been taking one document from here and one from there out of 5,000 pages. I don't even know what he's showing there. We have to be professional here and ask questions in a professional way.
He should have said that the critical path, in the document he was referring to, is something that happened after cabinet adoption. I understand from the question that he's trying to imply that those things happened before, but that's absolutely not the case. There was a critical path to get things out the door, but only after it was adopted by cabinet. This was done to make sure there was enough due diligence. The term “due diligence” here was the whole key of the document that Mr. Poilievre was referring to.