Evidence of meeting #26 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was know.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

He got the document. It showed the family members in it. The Kielburger brothers sent him this document, and he apparently did not know, even though it was right in this document.

Next point—

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Han Dong Liberal Don Valley North, ON

I have a point of order, Chair.

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin

Go ahead on a point of order, Mr. Dong.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Han Dong Liberal Don Valley North, ON

My understanding of conduct in a committee is that it is the same as in the House, so no props can be used during the committee. Is that true?

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

No.

3:20 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Absolutely not.

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin

That is not true. I've seen props being used many times, including documents.

We'll turn back to Mr. Poilievre.

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

A moment ago you were asked clearly if the Canada student service grant was retroactive to May 5. You answered, “no”.

I have here the contribution agreement. This is the date on which it was signed: June 23. It says here, “Effective date and duration: This Agreement shall come into effect on May 5th, 2020”.

Were you simply ignorant of the facts or were you deliberately misleading the committee when you said that it wasn't made retroactive?

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

I never mislead committees, Mr. Poilievre. Those are—

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

Why did you state a falsehood?

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Those are things that are negotiated by public servants. I'm not aware—

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

It says right here.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Well, then, that's what it is. Those are things that are negotiated—

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

You said it wasn't retroactive. Are you now saying it was retroactive? Let's be clear.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

I don't know.

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

You don't know.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

You have—

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

You don't seem to know very much about this, yet you're the minister responsible.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Well, I do. Ask questions on what you called the meeting for, and—

March 29th, 2021 / 3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

You're the minister responsible. You don't know, so let's get on to the next point.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Pablo Rodriguez Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Mr. Poilievre, just a second—

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

You said you don't know. That's your response.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Brenda Shanahan Liberal Châteauguay—Lacolle, QC

I have a point of order, Chair.

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Chris Warkentin

We have a point of order.

I did make it very clear that I did want the witness to have the opportunity to answer and to use the same length of time that the question took, but I do recognize the point of order.

Go ahead, Ms. Shanahan.

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Brenda Shanahan Liberal Châteauguay—Lacolle, QC

Well, it's on that point exactly, that the member should please allow the witness to respond to the question.