On a point of order, Chair, just to the member opposite's point about attacking or getting into it personally with another individual, Mr. Drouin was talking about whether my parents were alive or dead and whether we should be ordering their financial documents. Now his colleague is saying that it's inappropriate to engage in commentary about individuals when the motion at hand, which is what we should be discussing and not receiving a lecture, is about the Prime Minister of Canada and members of his family who received half a million dollars in payments from an organization that was asked to administer a half-billion dollar contribution agreement.
It just seems as though there's a bit of a disconnect, so I wonder about the relevance of even that point, which almost seemed to be an olive branch to my colleague Mr. Warkentin but is absolutely contrary to what Mr. Drouin was saying.
Therefore, I wonder if we can get back to the matter at hand, which is the documents.