Excuse me, Mr. Chair, I'm not playing partisan games. I just want to get a better understanding. Perhaps I haven't had the opportunity to see this kind of situation before. Can you quote the Standing Order that gives us the freedom not to debate Mr. Barrett's motion, which he clearly said was a motion to resume debate, in relation to Mr. Fortin’s motion? I wasn't aware that it was automatic, because I thought it was a motion that was made. If that's not the case, is it possible to explain the situation to me before I make my comments, since I really thought it was Mr. Barrett's motion?
On April 16th, 2021. See this statement in context.