Thank you, Chair.
The member opposite is offering her explanation here, but on relevance, the matter we're dealing with is an order of the House, not the procedures of the House in question period, for example. It's not debatable to conflate the two. They couldn't have less to do with each other.
The principles that the member has stated notwithstanding—and we've heard them for over one hour.... While she started her comments by saying that she would like to deal with other issues, that is disingenuous. This is a filibuster. She is not speaking to the matter at hand, she's reading from the green book. She might as well read us the phone book.