Okay.
The challenge is that there are two different parts here. For Mr. Barrett to withdraw his subamendment, all that is required is unanimous consent of the members. The second point, in terms of the timeline, would require an agreement of all members. That would be in a motion.
My sense is that Mr. Barrett's own support for his suggestion is contingent on the second part. So unless I get a sense from committee members that there is a willingness to proceed on both points, I think it's probably pointless to continue down the road of seeking unanimous consent on that part but not on the condition that would result in the unanimous consent.
Mr. Fergus.