I'll leave it to members to determine how far distanced they feel it is from the original, but I have said it before and I'll say it again: While there have been times when things have been referred to the subcommittees of a committee or to the House, it would be unprecedented for a committee to tell another committee what to do. I suspect that it would be met with some resistance from that committee. I know that we do not have any authority over that committee. We cannot tell another committee what to do.
You are correct that this is unusual. I have allowed it. I will allow members to use their discernment to determine whether or not they want to set the precedent of committees telling other committees what to do.