Okay.
Mr. Chair, I have grave concerns on the amended motion, if I'm using the proper language. Again, I believe we have gone back full circle. If I can use a golfing analogy, I think we had a mulligan today. That is the only way I can reference it. I think it's not a good thing for this committee to have done in accepting Madame Gaudreau's amendment to Mr. Angus's motion. We had a mulligan today. Let's call a fact a fact. That's what occurred today. I wish to express that disappointment: We had a do-over.
I have great concerns on the privacy implications of the amended motion. I have to go back and look at this. I have to read it over again to see where I stand. I am not in favour of it currently and will most likely continue to be so. I will yield the floor to one of my colleagues so that I can look at this amended motion and come back with some more wisdom on why and where the committee should proceed, in my humble view, in terms of what we should be doing.
It's really disappointing, Chair.
I will stop there and yield to the next speaker.