Mr. Angus, on your first point, I want to commend the clerk for the hours and hours of work that she did.
I reviewed some options over the past three days because we had heard from members about some concerns. We combed through literally.... I think if I remember, the earliest ruling was about 30 years old. I might be off by 10 years, but there have been precedents set.
However, I agree with you, Mr. Angus, and that's why I said that although a vote has been negatived in the past, I don't think it's a good practice of the committee.
As far as the motion on the floor today goes, again, after studying a number of precedents, I see enough variance in this motion that it is in order. It does call on a study rather than just a submission of documents, and there are several other points in it that are substantially different, so it is in order, and now we're debating that motion.
We will move on to Mr. Barrett.