I have a point of order, Chair.
I'm just hoping that maybe we can actually get our committee back to a working relationship. I'm very glad Mr. Dong went and read the rule book, but this is clearly not a dilatory motion, and you ruled on it.
As for Madam Gladu's attack on Mr. Dong, I would like to offer a compromise. I mean, Mr. Dong has been obstructing our work for four months. We could have dealt with his motion at any time if we'd gotten our work done. As a compromise, I would ask Mr. Dong if he would agree to ask his Liberal colleagues to stop obstructing our work, allow us to deal with this motion and allow us to get this study done. If we had done this study back in September, we could be looking at his. Whether it has merit or not, we would have had an opportunity.
In an offer of compromise to Mr. Dong, would he agree to stop obstructing so that we're not wasting another day, another week, another two or three or four months? Then he may actually have an opportunity to present something to us. It's an offer of compromise.