Okay. I was going to say that I remember.... First of all, I asked a whole bunch of questions when we considered Mr. Barrett's motion, including why we would run a parallel investigation with the commissioner's. The other point I pointed out is that there have been 14 motions put forward for discussion, and I just feel there was no opportunity for me to even propose the motion, which is of great interest to my constituents. We all have constituents to answer to.
The third point is that Mr. Barrett moved a motion to dispose of Madam Gaudreau's original motion and to put his motion forward. There was a recent precedent set, and that's why I put forward this dilatory motion for the committee to vote on.