I would like something explained. Obviously, I am not satisfied with the member's comments. What's more, the person who replaced me, Mrs. Vignola, made it clear that statements she could not understand were not translated and that she certainly did not vote that way. It was a mistake.
Why does the committee not invite her to address that? Why does the committee not examine what transpired?
Members are commenting on what happened, but they need to be careful. We have not gotten to the bottom of the matter. Certain things were not confirmed. I did not ask her to vote that way. She even indicated that she could not, in good conscience, vote that way and that she did not have the information she needed. She had neither the text, nor the audio. That is serious.