Mr. Chair, on a point order, we learned about Mr. Baylis's Barbadian family history from Mrs. Shanahan. If Mr. Dong has something relevant and new to say, he should say something new and relevant. If he is just going to crib Mrs. Shanahan's notes and repeat the same stuff that held up our committee for hours and hours before, I question, again, the rules.
Maybe you need to explain to Mr. Dong what the rules are. I am sure he knows them and is just ignoring them, but he can't repeat again and again the stuff that's already been established. His Barbadian history is irrelevant.
The question is on the motion. Are they going to obstruct or can we get to a vote?