Thank you very much, Chair.
We find ourselves back here again, 33 hours in, and hearing a recounting from the Liberals of their previous testimony. Early in the meeting, Mr. Angus laid out what brought us here. We heard from Madame Gaudreau the plain reason that this motion ought to come to vote. Everyone has had their say.
I'd like to speak briefly to and address the comments made by Mr. Dong. He made comments with respect to the Speakers' Spotlight documents. He read into the record a tweet from that organization.
The comments that I made in committee were the information that was provided to us. The situation is that some of the information is still there, while some of it has been purged. There are no lies that have been spoken by me.
I find it really interesting to hear Mr. Dong talk about the offence of having Ms. Gladu come to committee and address the motion that was ruled out of order and for Mr. Dong to interject on points of order and say they weren't points of order when one of the Liberal substitutes who came to the committee, Mr. Drouin, interjected a few times and attempted to take control of the meeting in a pretty high-pitched way.
It's interesting, because the connections to the Ontario Liberal Party that the federal Liberals have are pertinent to the question of destroyed documents. The chief of staff to former Ontario Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty, David Livingston, was found guilty and ultimately sent to jail for mischief in relation to data and attempted misuse of a computer system to commit mischief. The ruling stated, “Mr. Livingston's plan to eliminate sensitive and confidential work-related data, in my view”—