Colleagues, there's been an amendment tabled by Mr. Fergus in regard to a change of date. The complication with Mr. Fergus's amendment is that it falls within a broader amendment that the committee voted for. It's part of the amendment made previously by Madame Gaudreau. The precedents that we've looked at.... We have proactively looked at it because the clerk and I had conversations with regard to how this motion was evolving. If there is unanimous consent of the members of the committee—of course, we can do anything by UC—then this amendment can be accepted.
If not, Mr. Fergus, with respect, I have to rule it out of order, because it's an amendment, as I said, that was part of an amendment that's already been accepted by the committee in regard to the motion.
I'll just end there and let Mr. Fergus give some input, and then canvass the committee.