Again, I understand hypothetically what can be done with the technology. All I am substantiating is that we've had multiple people here who have testified, and none of them have said any of these things. As you know, when you're at a committee, whether you're sworn in or not, you are beholden to tell the truth under penalty of perjury or penalty of contempt of Parliament.
Nobody has testified to this. In fact, I'm just going to read what the CBSA said:
Devices examined by the CBSA's digital forensics teams have been seized pursuant to specific court orders such as search warrants or judicial authorizations issued to CBSA investigators. The data extracted from seized digital devices is processed only within the CBSA's own digital forensic laboratories and is provided only to those having lawful authority to access that data.
The CBSA also said:
I'd also like to clarify that spyware is typically defined as software installed in a device for the purposes of covertly intercepting, monitoring and/or gathering a user's activities or data. I want to assure the committee and the Canadian public that digital forensic tools utilized by the CBSA's investigators are not spyware. We use digital forensics hardware and software to unlock and decrypt seized digital devices as an important tool in our efforts to enforce border-related legislation and to protect Canadians.
You have no basis to dispute any of the things that are said there, do you?