It's part of a pattern, Chair, from the Liberals—Ms. Khalid, Mr. Sorbara—to interrupt the line of questioning to try to cover up for the Prime Minister, and she's going to do it again right now.
On the key question of whether Justin Trudeau had consent to engage in the activity, the only question was on whether Prime Minister Justin Trudeau committed fraud on government. The RCMP didn't pick up the phone, but Conservatives asked him the question and we got the answer. That answer is publicly available. It was not protected—it's like transcripts from a committee—so it could be used and has evidentiary value.
Knowing that, and based on that decision tree, wouldn't that affect the decision of the RCMP to lay a charge of fraud on government against the Prime Minister, if all the criteria set out in the decision tree from Watt's Manual of Criminal Jury Instructions were satisfied? Wouldn't that new evidence satisfy your investigation?