When it comes to establishment of that intent, I was not elected at the time; I followed the breaking story in The Globe and Mail on what transpired and the damning testimony that Jody Wilson-Raybould brought forward at committee. It was extraordinary to watch. I was very troubled at the time by how narrow the constraints were on the evidence that could be obtained by the office of the Ethics Commissioner but also, in light of that, by the justice committee and presumably the impacts that had in relation to the RCMP being able to get to the bottom of exactly what you've referred to, about knowing what that intent was.
Could having more evidence and understanding what the bigger context is...? Certainly, you don't know what you don't know, but if there was more information available, could that have influenced and led to you, the RCMP and others coming to a different conclusion?