Mr. Dion and Mr. Finckenstein, I'm going to ask you the same question. Remember I only have two and a half minutes.
Based on your experience as a result of your mandate, during which you had to consider cases involving cabinet confidences, do you believe that there should be more clarification on the circumstances in which access to documents could be obtained? Should there be a special procedure, in a similar investigation involving a minister or the prime minister, that would allow you to investigate fully? When there is more light by which to see, sometimes a different conclusion can be drawn. Indeed, your comments in this regard were quite accurate.
After listening to the previous witnesses, I get the impression that that they considered the presence of cabinet confidences to be problematic. I feel, on the contrary, that it's a good thing. Should any changes be made here?