I don't know—I feel like my Liberal friends doth protest too much. I think Mr. Villemure's motion is a rational motion. I don't see it as being an issue. When new information is presented to committee, particularly of this formal nature, it's something we should take into consideration.
The report is in our hands, ultimately, as a committee. We can decide to adopt additional information into our reporting. We can decide to recall witnesses. We can do all of those things. Given the complexity of this, there's value in addressing or at least acknowledging the work that's being done there.
For that reason, I support Mr. Villemure's motion. I don't see any downside at all at this point in doing the prudent thing and waiting to see what comes out of that.
I'm happy to see this go to a vote if there's no consensus.