I would agree with Mr. Finkelstein on the question of having an investigatory capacity. I think that's important.
More broadly, I think it's really about looking at the offices of Parliament and thinking about how to protect your ability as parliamentarians to ensure what you're working with as your ground truth is based on fact: how to do that, how to train your staff and how to build their capacity to be resilient so that everyone who then interacts with you, whether it's your constituents or others, knows that you're at least a trusted source. I'm not talking about your policy positions. I'm talking about the ground truth that you're using to make decisions. I think parliamentary staff are going to be more targeted by these technologies, such as deepfake videos, manipulated voices and those sorts of things.
The other piece, then, is how you are going to protect the body of Canadian society that is your constituents and how you are going to protect the next generations. This is why I was suggesting a Canadian charter of digital rights and freedoms that outlines both the responsibilities and protections of Canadian citizens. I know that there's been a lot on the online harms act, but I don't think it clarifies to citizens what their responsibilities are and what protections may be available to them.
I'll stop there because I know we have limited time, but thank you very much for that question.