I appreciate that.
I have one final question, if I could, for Mr. Loewen and Mr. Frank. Hopefully, there's time here.
We saw two examples and, of course, everything is political around here. One is Justice Hogue's report, and we've talked a lot about that.
Also, the Deputy Prime Minister posted a video that end up being flagged on Twitter as being edited. It was a montage, basically, of former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole and a few different things he had said over the course of a more extensive conversation about health care. It was posted as if it was saying something that certainly was not what was intended and certainly not what was said in the context of the larger sentence.
Just quickly, how do we make this balance? Often when somebody disagrees with you, they say that it's misinformation, disinformation or hatred, yet when it comes to their opinion, if you oppose that, the whole conversation gets über-torqued and emphasized to the 10th degree.
How do we make sure that we bring it down to say, “How do we deal with the facts?”
Could both of you take maybe 15 seconds?