That's a good question.
We know that the RCMP committed to making improvements to its policies, even though they did reject the overall finding that they're responsible for the lawfulness of third party technology. We haven't seen anything released publicly about that yet, and in fact, it speaks to one of the problems we see right now that, in theory, federal agencies need to undertake privacy impact assessments before new technology or new privacy-impactful projects are undertaken, but those assessments are often not done at all. If they are done, they may be kept secret. There's supposed to be an executive summary shared, but often, especially from law enforcement and intelligence agencies, those aren't shared, based on the idea that it would have an impact on their operations, whereas we feel that there needs to be pressure to have a greater degree of transparency and accountability there.