I have a point of order, Chair.
Again, with respect to your ruling, Chair, requesting that the member be succinct and speak exactly to how his privileges were breached, what he's offering is opinion on perceptions of members of another party about issues in the news. I fail to see how what I think about something or how I treat something—for example, foreign interference—has anything to do with his claims that another member of this committee...or that his privileges were breached. If he has a specific allegation with respect to that—