No, Mr. Chair, I'm not challenging.... I think there are two different things. I understand the question is this: Shall the ruling of the chair be sustained? If you don't agree, you vote no. That's, I think, where there's a confusion.
What I've challenged is not that you gave the floor to Mr. Barrett. It's that a privilege motion should supersede anything else. As a result, we had a privilege motion, and the floor should go to Mr. Bains. It's not challenging who you saw or didn't see first.