On the amendment that takes out the other Randy—the subject of great interest, this other Randy—and the Ghaoui Group, I have a curiosity. Members opposite, Liberal members, have said they don't want to drag citizens in front of the committee, but these two people are certainly citizens, and 50% of the amendment removes the other Randy. What are they looking to achieve with the protection of this other individual?
We have someone who's named in these texts—Randy—working at Randy Boissonnault's company, and when Mr. Anderson was asked if there was another Randy, he said that he did work with one. He wouldn't say what their name was, but they were the head of logistics. It's highly suspicious, to say the least, that Randy Boissonnault owns 50% of this company but can't tell us who the other Randy is who works for him at a small company, and that his partner and co-founder also won't say who the other Randy is.
It strikes me as a bit disingenuous, to say the least, that the Liberal members are saying that they're not just—