Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm rather sorry that I wasn't here yesterday, because apparently some good discussions took place.
I want to remind my colleagues that we're here in pursuit of the public interest and not the truth, which is a bit complicated. Certainly, in a case of this nature, questions must be asked and answers must be provided. That much is clear.
I think that we should also keep in mind that, in addition to these questions that must be asked, we have work to do. We have a report to revise. The TikTok study and the misinformation study aren't finished.
I can see that we spent five meetings wondering who Randy Boissonnault is. I'm not saying that the question isn't valid. I'm just saying that we need to weigh the pros and cons. We need to figure out where we're headed with this.
I would like to ask my colleagues to act wisely so that we can quickly resolve the matter before us. However, let's try to do so with the public interest in mind. There's a public interest component to all this. The public interest is much broader than knowing who Randy Boissonnault is.
Thank you.