It was sometime back in April. A game plan was indicated in the meeting schedule of what meetings we were going to have and on what days based on the motions that were proposed. There's been a lot of back-and-forth and a lot of motions have been moved. It's a very dynamic and fluid situation on this committee that I've been trying to get through. The analysts have written a report on the data collection and information tools that we've been trying to get to, too. Unfortunately, there's no way we're going to end up presenting that report to Parliament before this session is over.
That game plan was shared with the committee back in April, with specific dates, specific studies and specific meetings. It did not necessarily have specific witnesses, but it was shared with the committee. What I've been trying to do—and we've had extreme difficulty in doing this because of motions that have been moved, which is the right of every member to do—is work within that game plan. Unfortunately, we haven't. That was shared with all members of the committee back in April.
Any sense or thought that somehow I'm trying to have meetings that haven't been scheduled...with the exception of one. That was the one on the Thursday that we were going to start the Winnipeg lab documents study. We had the Information Commissioner, who was here for one opportunity. In terms of the other two witnesses, one was on the list and the other wasn't. It was the current president of PHAC. We had them come in at that time because we were running out of runway, frankly, on all the other dates we had put on the schedule.
Look, there's nothing I hate more than coming in on an off week, but my job, in conjunction with those of the clerk and the analysts, is to ensure that this committee functions and that we have meetings. The game plan was laid out in April. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to meet up with it. If you go back to April, it was shared by the clerk with all members of the committee and had exactly what those meetings were going to be.
Ms. Khalid, on Monsieur Desilets' amendment, please go ahead.