I appreciate that; I actually do. Maybe it's the first truth I heard today. I say this because that is a far leap from an autocorrect. You're now admitting, on the record—and it's important you do that, by the way, because you do have to respect the Standing Orders of the House of Commons when asked direct questions—that, in fact, there was no other Randy in logistics. Now your testimony has changed. Now your testimony is that it was an autocorrect. Is the autocorrect still listing a head of logistics or have we determined that, in fact, there is no head of logistics or that they weren't involved in that conversation?
On July 17th, 2024. See this statement in context.