Thank you.
To go back to the process as it stands, particularly given the refusal to answer direct questions. For those of you who follow, you will know that it is often the case that the NDP consistently demands documents and evidence, and is supportive of having witnesses provide testimony. Although we're not judicial or even quasi-judicial in nature, I think it's important that we recognize the powers Parliament has.
Having said that, if there were questions related to the refusal, they couldn't be dealt with procedurally until the House rises, anyway. That's just a fact. I'm of the mind that we use that timeline, which gives us the parliamentary processes and procedures when we are sitting again. As it relates to the Speaker and as we were going to, potentially, report back to the House, it's in keeping with the work that we're doing rather than getting ahead of it. That's my position.