I am concerned, based on some of the comments I received from people who were parked outside on Wellington Street, about disinformation still about COVID, and disinformation about the nature of government, conspiracy theories, outright delusion and political violence.
I worry that if we just say “electoral”.... Does that limit the scope? I don't want to limit it because I do believe that a lot of the social upheaval that we have been witnessing post-COVID comes from a bunch of different streams of wackiness that, when balled up, could lead to electoral interference, but might not be, on face value, just electoral interference.
Mr. Villemure, just to get the spirit of the amendment, would this limit us from looking at ways in which other tangential conspiracies and disinformation also affect the electoral process, or are we solely going to be looking at commentary on political actors, parties and leaders?