Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I have to tell you that I'm going to try the unlikely feat of reconciling Ms. Khalid and Mr. Barrett, because the two points they made are very interesting. Obviously, we shouldn't underestimate the study on disinformation, specifically electoral disinformation—I think that's something that could be added. Mr. Barrett suggested removing the line that refers to the Leader of the Opposition. That is quite fine with me, because the topic needs to be dealt with in a general way, and as Ms. Khalid said, we need to take the partisanship out of it. So it's not an issue at all.
However, if we remove the words “immediately” and “next” from the last paragraph, I am afraid that it could mean “never.” I have a problem with that, because we could get bogged down in a number of considerations and never do it. So I have a concern about that.
I can provide you with a list of witnesses that would satisfy everyone, no problem. I think we need to move forward.
I would just ask for something minor from Mr. Barrett. I think that adding the word “electoral” to “disinformation” would be appropriate, and I would ask for flexibility in terms of the time frame, because I fear that we will never do it. I would like him to comment on that.
Those are basically my two questions.