Yes. The initial motion is very general because it speaks about undertaking a study of misinformation and disinformation and the impact on the work of parliamentarians. It says, “that the committee devote...the next three available meetings” and “that the committee invite experts in the field of misinformation and disinformation; and that the committee report its observations and recommendations to the House.”
With the initial motion, which we're going to carry on with, and the additional up to three meetings that we talked about, we can propose to expand that study any way we want. The initial motion, in my view, captures precisely what you're talking about. This motion, in the context of that study, adds to it.
If you're satisfied with that.... I know I am. The intention of the committee is very clear to me, and I think it's clear to the clerk as well. If it wasn't, I'd tell you.
Again, what comes with this is a list of witnesses that we need to contact in order for this study to continue. I throw that out to you guys.
We're going to stick with the subamendment as agreed to by committee on “electoral”.
I'm now on the amendment. I have Mr. Caputo, Mr. Cooper and then Mr. Fisher.
Mr. Caputo, on the amendment proposed by Mr. Barrett, go ahead, sir.