I do understand. I think it's important to recognize that 60% to 70% of Republicans believe the big lie, which is absolutely astounding. It's going to have an impact on the election.
I think there is a way to deal with the big lie at a meta level—in which case you point out that the big lie is wrong—and also to carefully outline all of the things that you highlighted and why they're factually in error. This really goes to that idea of belief speaking versus fact speaking. I actually think that many people don't believe that it was stolen, but they believe the gist of the point. They're very willing to accept the broader lie.
You have to do both. You have to talk about the error of the meta lie and then you have to unpack each specific lie.
By the way, again, this happens across the ideological spectrum. I can give you examples from the left.