Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Obviously, I am completely opposed to the introduction of this motion in its current form, for several reasons. First of all, we had this report a year ago, almost to the day. I think I'm the only member here who was on the committee last year, when the report was written. Everyone had their say—government members and the other members of the committee. Everyone was satisfied in the end. The report was tabled in the House of Commons by the chair of the committee at the time.
As my colleague just said, the WE Charity no longer exists. This issue is obsolete. I am disappointed that anyone would try to play political games in the middle of an important discussion and testimony on facial recognition, when everyone here has recognized the importance of this issue. It's really unfortunate.
Mr. Chair, we had a private discussion, and I'm not convinced that this motion is in order, since an almost identical motion was moved a few months ago. Back then, we debated the motion, and it was defeated. Yet now, there's an attempt to reopen the issue by making a few superficial tweaks to a motion to make it admissible. We know that's what's going on here, so why debate this issue all over again?
I hope that with a little reflection, we can come up with something that we can all support, with a more reasonable objective. We'll have to see what everyone thinks, of course. All I want to say is that there are other ways of going about this. I hope that we won't spend too long on this and that we won't waste the committee's time or the House of Commons' time.