I'm not aware of the specifics. I would say that, as I mentioned during my opening remarks, the boundaries of acceptable foreign involvement and domestic discourse are often unclear.
For example, in democracies, it is traditionally acceptable for a foreigner to speak in a domestic context, and it could be a foreign corporation, a foreign resident or a foreign business. It could be called public diplomacy and the like. Equivalently, it could traditionally be acceptable for a citizen or a politician domestically to engage with foreigners.
Things often become more challenging where there is some kind of covertness to the relationship and a violation of domestic law. I'll say that the norms and the boundaries around this are really being rethought and reinvestigated for this new era.