Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Gray, you have repeatedly stated here today that you believe that there was no intent to mislead. Let's look at what happened. CTV spliced together three short sound bites. Sound bites were spliced together, not even in the order that they were stated, to create an entirely made-up sentence. It was literally fake news that entirely changed the meaning of what Pierre Poilievre said. On exactly what basis do you conclude that there was no intent to mislead?