I'm not familiar with that particular case or scenario, but it is an interesting piece of information you're providing. Based on what you've shared, I think it's very difficult for us to point to any politically elected individual in that decision-making process. The challenge we have, as I pointed out, is that sometimes it's our civil servants who make these decisions that harm.
Let's clarify that. There are three different types that we characterize as insider threat actors. There are some who are non-malicious, without intent: “Oops, I did this. I had no idea.” Then there's malicious with intent. There's also non-malicious but with intent, and that's the really weird one. I can say that I'm not malicious, but I really thought this would be better, so I did it and, yes, it contravened policy or it didn't have the right outcome.